|
Most Screen Savers $ 14.95 each plus shipping and handling. Sales Tax
applies in some states.
| |
The City Lights Reporter
Online News Journal
May
2002 -Volume 5 Issue
3
Promises
Promises
Is
Broadband
Dead
Or
Alive

By;
James I. Neusom, II
Have
you
seen
the
new
Samsung
commercial
on
CNN
promoting
all
the
multimedia
services
that
their
digital
devices
can
deliver?
I
know
you've
received
a
letter,
an
email
or
seen
a
banner
ad
on
DSL
and
Cable
modems.
Everybody
pushing
the
promises
of
Broadband
or
high
speed
data,
but
is
it
real
or
is
it
Memorex?
With
universal
deployment
of
high
speed
data
via
DSL
phone
lines,
Cable
modems
and
Satellite
dishes
stuck
in
neutral,
now
even
the
consumer
electronics
industry
has
jumped
on
the
broadband
bandwagon.
FCC
Chairman
Michael
Powell
has
stated
that
his
goal
was
to
make
the
United
States
the
most
wired
nation
in
the
world.
That
goal
has
become
an
uphill
battle
in
this
economy.
Has
anybody
else
noticed
that
Enron,
Global
Crossing,
and
WorldCom
are
all
communication
companies
built
on
the
promises
of
broadband
high
speed
data.
A
report
on
the
impact
of
broadband
services
on
economic
growth
raised
some
eyebrows
because
of
the
conclusion
that
the
U.S.
could
lose
as
much
as
$500
billion
a
year
in
"potential
economic
benefits"
because
of
a
slowdown
in
the
rollout
of
broadband
offerings
to
consumers.
But
a
coauthor
of
the
report
admits
that
some
of
the
report's
underlying
assumptions
aren't
based
on
direct
evidence.
The
report,
from
Criterion
Economics
(a
Washington
based
consulting
company),
points
to
shopping,
entertainment,
telecommuting,
telecom
services
and
telemedicine
as
contributors
to
broadband's
economic
benefits.
But
Charles
Jackson,
an
engineering
consultant
who
coauthored
the
report
with
Bob
Crandall,
an
economist
at
the
Brookings
Institution,
admits
that
there
is
no
direct
evidence
to
suggest
that
today's
broadband
users
are
reaping
such
benefits.
That
reminds
me
of
the
Killer
App
theory
where,
they
say
that
residential
broadband
will
never
take
off
until
a
killer
app
comes
along. That
kind
of
thinking
was
the
death
of
Dot.com
and
will
do
the
same
to
broadband.
Give
consumers
lighting
speed
and
a
persistent
connection,
and
they'll
discover
a
Killer
App
on
their
own.
Now
based
on
the
promises
and
the
hype,
a
growing
number
of
economists,
industry
leaders
and
government
policy-makers
are
pushing
just
about
any
incentive
that
might
jump-start
new
network
initiatives
or
build-outs.
For
example
the
FCC
has
moved
to
spur
competition
between
phone
and
cable
companies
by
tentatively
redefining
DSL
as
an
"information
service"
rather
than
a
telecom
service.
Like
it
or
not,
the
Bells
are
right
in
the
middle
of
the
broadband
battle.
In
its
broadest
sense,
the
competition
has
boiled
down
to
the
Bells
and
the
cable
providers,
leaving
broadband
satellite
and
wireless
as
niche
markets.
Now,
even
the
journals
of
conventional
wisdom
are
catching
up
to
the
facts.
In
a
WorldCom
article
in
the
New
York
Times
by
Seth
Schiesel,
it
was
said:
With
dozens
of
other
telecommunications
upstarts
now
bankrupt,
WorldCom's
mounting
problems
make
it
increasingly
likely
that
the
dominant
players
in
the
telecommunications
industry
may
be
the
remaining
offspring
of
that
old
antediluvian
Bell
System:
the
local
telephone
giants
like
BellSouth,
SBC
Communications
and
Verizon.
Rep.
Billy
Tauzin
(R.-La.),
chairman
of
the
House
Commerce
Committee
and
sponsor
of
the
Tauzin-Dingell
bill,
likes
to
explain
broadband
to
his
hunting-camp
buddies
as
a
cold,
immediately
available
beer
—
as
opposed
to
dial-up,
which
is
a
sort
of
near-beer
you
have
to
wait
an
hour
to
get.
Many
of
us
had
hoped
that
government
intervention
would
not
come
until
more
competition
had
been
squeezed
out
of
the
industry.
But
it's
looking
as
if
that's
not
going
to
happen.
Barring
a
major
decrease
in
Bell
momentum,
competitive
carriers
who
want
to
take
on
the
Bells
are
going
to
have
to
do
it
head-to-head,
with
war
chests
suited
to
the
battle.
Although
the
combined
subscriber
count
for
wireless
and
satellite
broadband
services
grew
by
more
than
70%
over
the
past
several
months,
the
two
services
still
account
for
less
than
2%
of
the
U.S.
broadband
market,
according
to
a
Federal
Communications
Commission
study
released
Aug.
9.
According
to
Meg
McGinty
a
senior
writer
with
The
Net
Economy
(www.theneteconomy.com),
"dial-up
Internet
service
providers
have
been
living
on
borrowed
time
for
a
few
years
now.
With
online
households
reaching
the
saturation
point
and
broadband
services
showing
impressive
growth,
it's
just
a
matter
of
time
before
dial-up
ISPs
see
their
business
evaporate.
Or
so
the
logic
goes.
Never
mind
that
the
69
million
users
still
hooked
into
the
Internet
account
for
about
87%
of
the
nation's
online
subscribers,
or
that
take
rates
for
cable
and
DSL
service
have
been
quietly
disappointing.
With
broadband
subscriber
growth
at
62%
last
year
and
dial-up
at
a
measly
1%,
dial-up
ISPs
have
to
make
the
transition
to
broadband
service
to
survive.
Or
so
the
logic
goes.
"Time
is
of
the
essence,"
says
David
Epstein,
CEO
of
Connecticut
Telephone,
a
wireless
operator
that
also
offers
wire
line
DSL
service
in
Connecticut.
"It's
a
real
challenge
to
get
a
user
back
once
he's
signed
on
with
another
provider."
The
top
five
dial-up
ISPs
—
America
Online,
Microsoft
Network,
United
Online,
EarthLink
and
Prodigy
—
are
at
various
stages
in
executing
their
respective
broadband
strategies.
So
far,
only
Prodigy
—
which
is
owned
by
Bell
company
SBC
Communications
—
has
converted
a
significant
portion
of
its
customer
base
to
broadband."
(see
full
article
at
www.theneteconomy.com)
All
this
fuss
over
broadband
might
seem
strange
to
professionals
accustomed
to
the
world
of
T-1,
T-3,
Synchronous
Optical
or
Gigabit
Ethernet
Networks
at
work,
with
their
always
on
and
instant
access
capabilities
and
features.
But
as
anyone
who
experienced
the
now
defunct
@home
network
or
even
regular
cable
will
tell
you,
It
aint
all
its
cracked
up
to
be
when
it
comes
to
residential
service.
We
forget
that
at
work
there
are
invisible,
ubiquitous
professionals
constantly
monitoring,
adjusting
and
fine
tuning
the
network.
Cable
modem
and
DSL's
speeds
are
defined
by
the
number
of
subscribers
on
any
current
hub.
The
more
people
that
sign
up
in
your
apartment
building,
the
slower
and
more
congested
your
access
to
the
Net
becomes.
There
can
be
no
doubt
that
the
economic
consequences
of
broadband
could
be
enormous
for
the
country.
Today's
standard
dial-up
speed
of
56K
bps
is
hardly
fast
enough
to
download
large
audio
or
video
files.
to
obtain
complicated
visual
images
required
for
real-time
computer
games
or
to
conduct
advanced
e-commerce.
Without
universal
high-speed
access,
the
evolution
of
the
Internet
to
its
full
potential
is
temporarily
blocked,
and
it
contribution
to
the
acceleration
in
economic
growth
may
soon
end.
Universal
broadband
is
not
a
dot-com
issue,
nor
are
it
benefits
limited
to
online
retailing
or
electronic
deliver
of
entertainment
products.
When
you
consider
the
business
benefits
of
videoconferencing,
data
processing,
voice
over
IP,
etc.
the
effect
on
the
average
persons
live
will
be
enormous.
Factor
in
the
implications
of
3G
next
generation
wireless,
Bluetooth
and
802.11
WiFi
technology
and
you
have
the
making
of
another
techno
boom
that
can
change
everything
we
do
and
the
way
we
do
it.
Yes,
government
regulation
is
needed,
but
too
often
government
is
short
sited.
Many
aspects
of
universal
broadband
are
tied
to
regulation,
oversight
and
laws
that
are
outdated
almost
as
soon
as
they're
enacted.
The
FCC
redefinition
was
a
first
step
and
the
bills
in
the
US
House
and
Senate
are
a
good
start,
but
not
enough.
We
need
to
call
on
government
and
industry
leaders
to
set
a
national
goal
of
making
the
United
States
the
most
wired
nation
on
earth.
Currently
we
rank
seventh
in
the
world,
far
behind
Asia
(number
1)
and
Europe.
We
need
to
mobilize
all
segments
of
American
industry
and
society
to
make
a
"Broadband
Nation"
a
priority
similar
JFK's
call
for
a
man
on
the
moon.
We
need
to
stop
talking
about
promoting
broadband
and
start
acting
on
making
affordable
universal
broadband
assessable
to
everyone.
TOP OF
PAGE
NEXT PAGE
PREVIOUS
PAGE
[Home]
[Reporter] [Products]
[Services] [About
Us] [Reseller Info] [Policies]
[Contact Us]
Developed and Maintained By:
InterServe Networks, Inc.
Copyright
© 2000 - 2001 by InterServe Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.
This
web site contains "Trademarks" and "Copyrighted"
material licensed to other entities and cannot
be reproduced, altered, or used in any form without prior written
permission. Please read our Terms
Of Use for compliance information.
|
|